Amendments and revisions of the 1987 philippine constitution

Why the 1987 Constitution has endured for 32 years without amendment

amendments and revisions of the 1987 philippine constitution

Philippines after The 1987 Constitution

and   season episode   your   and    wish coupon for existing customers   how do you count from 1 to 10 in japanese   does driving slower save gas

Constitutional reform in the Philippines , also known as Charter Change colloquially Cha-Cha [1] , refers to the political and legal processes needed to amend the current Constitution of the Philippines. Under the common interpretation of the Constitution, amendments can be proposed by one of three methods: a People's Initiative , a Constituent Assembly or a Constitutional Convention. While no amendment to the Constitution has succeeded, there have been several high-profile attempts. None reached the ratification by referendum stage. The President, through official proclamation or executive order, may create a consultative body that will study and propose amendments or revisions to the constitution.

Resisting such an initiative, provided it is supported by a rational public consensus-building process, is an integral component of constitutional democracy as well. As a constitutional democracy, the Philippines finds itself perfectly within this constitutional reform context. Obviously, the Duterte administration is fully committed to increase public awareness and support for federalism and charter reform. But there is still no guarantee that Filipinos will rally behind a move to enact a new constitution. In all three instances, any revision to the national charter shall only be valid when approved by the electorate in a plebiscite. President Duterte and his allies in Congress favor the constituent assembly mode 1 because they see it as the practical choice.

The House of Representatives recently issued a resolution asking that members of Congress which, in a bicameral set-up, is composed of the Senate and the House of Representatives convene to consider amendments or revisions of the Constitution. Full text of House Resolution No. WHEREAS , there are proposals to amend or revise the Constitution, which is presently enforced, but any of such proposals cannot be considered, heard, debated, approved or disapproved, unless any of the modes expressly provided by Article XVII of the present Constitution is adopted;. WHEREAS , adopting a mode of amending or revising the Constitution , as mandated by said Article XVII is a condition precedent, a pre-requisite, before specific proposals to amend or revise the Constitution could be considered by the Members of Congress, convened to exercise the constitutionally ordained power to amend or revise the Constitution. WHEREAS , there is a recognized distinction between the exercise of legislative powers of Congress from the exercise of the constituent power to amend or revise the Constitution;. WHEREAS, while the prescribed method of enacting constitutional change in the , , and Constitutions are different from the method of enacting ordinary legislation, there is a very distinct and notable difference between the and the Constitution, which respectively provides as follows:. The percentage of voting three-fourths of the respective membership of each House the Senate and the House of Representatives treated separately has also been deleted and substituted with a vote of three-fourths of all the Members of Congress i.

Notably, the current Philippine constitution has stood for three decades without any amendment. This is an odd quality considering that most constitutional scholars agree that national constitutions remain unamended on the average only for 19 years. One reason why the Philippine charter continues to be unamended could be the lack of clarity in the text itself on how to go about it. In all three instances, any revision to the national charter shall only be valid when approved by the electorate in a plebiscite. President Duterte and his allies in Congress favour the constituent assembly mode 1 because they see it as the practical choice. However, some charter reform advocates prefer the constitutional convention mode 2 because for them any cost to be incurred by the state should be acceptable given the gravity of this political exercise for all Filipinos.



Constitutional reform in the Philippines

We track the proposed revisions to the Constitution, based on draft constitutions and proposed changes by the House of Representatives. Efforts are currently underway in Congress to revise the current Constitution, mainly to set up a federal form of government. -

.

Changing the Constitution: What are being proposed so far

.

.

.

.

.

Any amendment to, or revision of, this Constitution may be proposed by: (1) The Congress, upon a vote of three-fourths of all its Members; or. (2) A constitutional.
black and white party decorations

.

.

.

1 thoughts on “Amendments and revisions of the 1987 philippine constitution

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *